What Constitutes an "Unlawful Termination" Under Saudi Labor Law?
Saudi labor jurisprudence does not recognize "at-will employment." An employer cannot dismiss an employee simply by offering arbitrary severance or citing vague "operational restructuring" unless strictly justified under statutory provisions.
An employment termination executed on Qiwa is legally classified as unlawful under Article 77 if it does not satisfy one of the lawful separation grounds defined in the Labor Law:
Statutory Safeguards & Rights Protection
Mandatory protections enforced by MHRSD & Saudi Labor Law
Common Unlawful Dismissal Scenarios Encountered on Qiwa
The Statutory Compensation Formula: Basic vs. Gross Wage
A critical area of dispute in labor conciliations is the definition of "wage" used to compute Article 77 damages. Employers frequently attempt to calculate severance solely on the Basic Salary (Al-Ajr Al-Asasi).
Under Article 2 of the Saudi Labor Law, all severance and statutory indemnities must be calculated on the Actual Gross Wage (Al-Ajr Al-Fa'li), which includes:
Detailed Calculation Models & Worked Scenarios
Model 1: Fixed-Term Contract Dismissal
Under Article 77, Paragraph 2, the compensation equals the total wage for the remaining contractual term.
Model 2: Indefinite (Open-Ended) Contract Dismissal
Under Article 77, Paragraph 1, compensation equals 15 days' wage for every year of service.
Model 3: The Mandatory Statutory Floor (Paragraph 3 Rule)
The law protects workers with short service or near-expiry contracts by establishing an absolute floor.
Contractual Penalty Clauses: Can an Employer Cap Article 77?
Article 77 opens with the clause: "Unless the contract includes specific compensation in case of its termination by one of the parties for an invalid reason..."
This clause allows parties to negotiate an agreed liquidated damages figure. However, Saudi Labor Courts apply strict public policy limitations:
Full Financial Separation Package: Article 77 vs. Other Entitlements
A widespread corporate misconception is that paying Article 77 damages absolves the employer from paying other end-of-service entitlements. In reality, an unlawful termination triggers four separate financial buckets:
| Compensation Element | Governing Statute | Calculation Basis | Whether Taxable / GOSI Deductible |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Article 77 Damages | Labor Law Art. 77 | Remaining contract or 15 days/yr (min. 2 mo.) | Severance indemnity (GOSI exempt) |
| 2. Notice Period Pay | Labor Law Art. 76 | 60 days gross wage (if notice was not served) | Regular wage (GOSI applicable) |
| 3. End of Service (ESB) | Labor Law Art. 84 | Full 100% scale (0.5 mo./yr for 1-5 yrs, 1 mo./yr after) | Statutory gratuity (GOSI exempt) |
| 4. Unused Annual Leave | Labor Law Art. 111 | Exact accrued balance × daily gross wage | Final compensation payout |
Step-by-Step Legal Procedure: Claiming Article 77 in Labor Court
If an employer terminates your contract unlawfully on Qiwa and refuses to pay Article 77 compensation, follow this statutory litigation roadmap:
Dispute Lodged on Waddi
File electronic labor grievance on MHRSD portal within 12 months (Article 222)
Virtual Amicable Conciliation
MHRSD conciliator conducts remote hearing; issues executive Reconciliation Deed
Najiz Labor Court & Enforcement
Judicial ruling by commercial labor panel; Article 46 bank freeze on non-payment
Step 1: Reject the Unlawful Qiwa Separation Worksheet
When the employer processes the termination on Qiwa, do not sign internal discharge papers (Ikhla' Taraf) stating that you have received all financial rights. On Qiwa Individuals, review the recorded reason. If the reason is inaccurate or the compensation is missing, record your objection.
Step 2: File Electronic Claim on MHRSD Waddi
Within 12 months of termination (statute of limitations under Article 222), submit a labor grievance on the MHRSD Portal under Amicable Settlement (التسوية الودية - ودي). Attach:
Step 3: Attend Waddi Virtual Conciliation (21 Days)
MHRSD schedules a mandatory video conciliation session within 21 business days.
Step 4: Labor Court Trial on Najiz
The commercial labor panel (Al-Da'irah Al-Ummaliyya) examines the authenticated Qiwa data. Because Qiwa contracts carry official evidentiary weight under the Saudi Law of Evidence, the burden of proof rests entirely on the employer to demonstrate valid statutory cause. In 90%+ of unsubstantiated dismissals, the court awards full Article 77 damages, notice compensation, and gratuity.
Step 5: Enforcement via Najiz Enforcement Court (Mahkama al-Tanfeez)
Once the final judgment (Hukm Qat'i) is issued, submit the execution request on Najiz. If the employer fails to disburse funds within 5 business days, the Enforcement Judge activates Article 46 sanctions:
Expat Legal Protection: Sponsorship Freeze & Lawsuit Work Permits
Expatriate workers often fear that filing an Article 77 lawsuit will result in retaliatory deportation or an "Absence from Work" (Inqita' an al-Amal) report.
Under current Saudi regulations:
Critical Traps to Avoid in Article 77 Claims
1. The Adhesion Discharge Trap
Never sign a separation agreement containing clauses like: "The employee hereby waives all future claims under Article 77, 84, and 85." While Article 8 invalidates waivers of statutory rights signed during an active employment relationship, signing an unconditional release after termination can complicate labor litigation.
2. Missing the Article 222 Limitation Clock
Under Article 222 of the Saudi Labor Law, Labor Courts will not accept any claim concerning employment rights if filed more than twelve (12) months following the formal termination date of the contract, unless a legally acceptable excuse is recognized by the judiciary.
3. Confusing Forced Resignation with Voluntary Exit
If an employer makes your workplace intolerable to force you to resign, do not submit a standard resignation on Qiwa. A standard resignation is recorded as an employee-initiated Article 75 separation, which forfeits Article 77 claims. Instead, resign under Article 81 (Constructive Dismissal) or file an immediate grievance with MHRSD.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Can an employee claim compensation under Article 77 if they resign voluntarily?
No. Article 77 compensation is awarded to the harmed party when the other party terminates the contract unlawfully. If an employee resigns voluntarily without legal grounds under Article 81, the employer may actually claim Article 77 compensation from the employee.
How long does a Labor Court case take to resolve in Saudi Arabia?
Thanks to the full digitization of the Ministry of Justice (Najiz) and MHRSD Waddi systems, standard labor disputes are resolved within 45 to 90 days (21 days in Waddi conciliation, followed by 2 to 3 virtual hearings in the Labor Court).
Is Article 77 compensation subject to GOSI deductions or income tax?
No. In Saudi Arabia, there is no personal income tax, and Article 77 termination indemnity is legally classified as statutory compensation for damages, which is completely exempt from GOSI social insurance contribution deductions.
What if my authenticated Qiwa contract has a lower salary than my real bank transfer?
Under the Saudi Law of Evidence and Wage Protection System (WPS) rules, Labor Courts accept official bank statements, Mudad transfer files, and corporate payslips as conclusive proof of your real actual wage (Al-Ajr Al-Fa'li), overriding understated contract figures.
Can an employer fire a Saudi national under Article 77 if they pay the compensation?
Under Ministerial Decisions regulating Saudization, an employer cannot dismiss Saudi workers under Article 77 if the establishment's Nitaqat Saudization ratio falls below statutory category minimums, or if the dismissal constitutes mass retrenchment (Fasl Jama'i) without prior MHRSD approval.
Facing Unlawful Dismissal or Defending Against Arbitrary Claims?
Whether you are a corporation navigating workforce restructuring compliance or an executive seeking enforcement of contractual severance, consult our specialized regulatory advocates at the Qiwa Platform Compliance Hub for comprehensive dispute representation before MHRSD and the Saudi Labor Courts.
Was this compliance guide helpful?
Your feedback helps our legal editorial team maintain authoritative KSA guidance.
Advocate High Court (Punjab Bar Council) and ATT GCC VAT Certified Specialist. Author of comprehensive regulatory commentaries on Saudi corporate law, ZATCA e-invoicing protocols, and Labor Reform Initiatives.